IP Newsflash | A law blog keeping you updated on recent developments in Intellectual Property law.

Subscribe

Follow us

Impermissible Enlargement of Claim Scope Undermines Motion to Amend

May 1, 2014

Reading Time : 1 min

By: Matthew George Hartman

Munchkin, Inc. v. Luv N’ Care, Ltd., IPR2013-00072 (PTAB April 21, 2014) [Bisk, Wood, Fitzpatrick (opinion)]

Categories

Patent Trial & Appeal BoardPrior ArtInter Partes Review

Subscribe to the IP Newsflash Blog Series >

Previous Entries

December 17, 2025

IPR Estoppel Under § 315(e)(1) Does Not Apply to Ongoing Ex Parte Reexamination

December 15, 2025

Delaware District Court Clarifies That Enhanced Damages Are a Form of Relief, Not a Claim That Can Be Dismissed on a Motion under Rule 12(b)(6)

December 9, 2025

Federal Circuit Denies Mandamus Petition Challenging the PTO Director’s Application of ‘Settled Expectations’ in IPR Proceedings