• Home
  • About
  • Explore Topics

Subscribe

IP Newsflash | A law blog keeping you updated on recent developments in Intellectual Property law.

Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Explore Topics
  • Subscribe

Follow us

    Rule 11 Sanctions Warranted Due to Plaintiff’s Objectively Unreasonable Claim Construction

    Apr 9, 2014

    Reading Time : 1 min

    By: Rubén H. Muñoz

    Tech. Innovations LLC v. Amazon.com. Inc., 1-11-cv-00690 (D. Del. March 31, 2014) (Robinson)

    Subscribe

    Share This Insight

    Categories

    District CourtClaim ConstructionDistrict of Delaware
    Subscribe to the IP Newsflash Blog Series >

    Previous Entries

    December 17, 2025

    IPR Estoppel Under § 315(e)(1) Does Not Apply to Ongoing Ex Parte Reexamination

    December 15, 2025

    Delaware District Court Clarifies That Enhanced Damages Are a Form of Relief, Not a Claim That Can Be Dismissed on a Motion under Rule 12(b)(6)

    December 9, 2025

    Federal Circuit Denies Mandamus Petition Challenging the PTO Director’s Application of ‘Settled Expectations’ in IPR Proceedings

    Intellectual Property Law FirmIP Law FirmPatent Law Firm
    HomeAboutExplore TopicsSubscribe
    Akin Corporate SiteLegal NoticesPrivacy PolicyCookie NoticeRSS

    © 2026 Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP